“This court accepts the defendants’ submission that a mere licensee of a TOL has no legitimate expectation for a renewal of the TOL by the land office upon the expiry of the term and that the licensee has no right to claim compensation for any structure or building erected on the TOL land upon the expiry of the TOL, as held by the various decided authorities cited by the defendants. The PIAM members' circular did not infringe s. 4(1) of the Act and therefore, there was no finding of liability on the part of the insurers and PIAM under the anti-competition law. The Competition Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal by Persatuan Insurans Am Malaysia (PIAM) and its 22 members against the Malaysia Competition Commission, deeming an agreement on the application of trade discounts on automotive parts prices and hourly labour rates for motor vehicle repairs by workshops under the PIAM Approved Repairers Scheme as a breach of the Competition Act 2010 ('Act'). COMPETITION COMMISSIONĬHOO KAH SING J (CHAIRMAN) ASMABI MOHAMAD JCA (COMM) VICTOR WEE ENG LYE (COMM) PERSATUAN INSURANS AM MALAYSIA (PIAM) & ORS v.

Uitm kedah library